October 11, 2022

Complaint against Justice D. Y. Chandrachud

Complaint filed against Justice D. Y. Chandrachud for offences of forgery, Contempt and serious criminal offences under IPC. President of ‘Supreme Court & High Court Litigant Association (SCHCLA)’ filed complaint on affidavit.
September 3, 2022

Health Problems after Covid Vaccine? Then Report AEFI (Adverse Event Following Immunization)

The Central Government has added an adverse event reporting system in the Cowin Portal. Any affected party can report an AEFI using their phone or computer.
August 29, 2022

Rachna Gangu vs UoI, WP(Civil) 1220 of 2021 – Case for vaccine compensation in SC

After hearing the petitioners, Hon’ble Justice Dinesh Maheshwari and Hon’ble Justice Bela M. Trivedi have issued a notice to UoI.
June 19, 2022

Criminal Writ Petition filed in Bombay High Court against Chief Secretary Maharastra Shri Manukumar Srivastava

Criminal Writ Petition No. 9300 of 2022
May 13, 2022

False Claims about the Indian Supreme Court Judgement against Vaccine Mandates Debunked

A landmark judgement was passed against vaccine mandates in India which has now made it illegal for anyone to discriminate between people on the ground of their vaccination status. However few people have been spreading wrong interpretations of the judgement, some due to their genuine misunderstandings, and others who are doing so on behalf of pharmaceutical companies and corrupt bureaucrats to intentionally misinterpret the judgment so that people don’t initiate compensation and prosecution charges on the criminals who enforced these illegal mandates. Below we conclusively debunk common false claims about the judgement : False Claim Number 1 The Supreme Court has not written anywhere in the order that it is illegal to discriminate between the vaccinated and unvaccinated. Reason : The Supreme Court in para 60 makes it very clear that vaccine mandates are not proportionate. 60. …in light of the data presented by the Petitioner, which has not been controverted by the Union of India as well as the State Governments, we are of the opinion that the restrictions on unvaccinated individuals imposed through vaccine mandates cannot be considered to be proportionate, especially since both vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals presently appear to be susceptible to transmission of the virus at similar levels.” Some people have spread false claims that just because the Supreme Court said these mandates are not proportionate, that does not mean that they are illegal. This interpretation is false and misleading, as the Supreme Court has clearly mentioned in other parts of the judgement that in order for restrictions on peoples fundamental rights to be legal and constitutional, they must pass the three criteria of proportionality, legality and need. Relevant parts which mention this are listed below 21. We shall now proceed to analyse the precedents of this Court on the ambit of judicial review of public policies relating to health. It is well settled that the Courts, in exercise of their power of judicial review, do not ordinarily interfere with the policy decisions of the executive unless the policy can be faulted on grounds of malafide, unreasonableness, arbitrariness or unfairness etc. Indeed, arbitrariness, irrationality, perversity or malafide will render the policy unconstitutional 48. The crucial point that requires to be considered by us is whether limitations placed by the Government on personal autonomy of an individual can be justified in the interest of public health in the wake of the devastating COVID-19 pandemic. As stated, personal autonomy has been recognized as a critical facet of the right to life and right to self-determination under Article 21 of the Constitution, by this Court in Common Cause (supra). In K.S. Puttaswamy (supra), this Court laid down three requirements to be fulfilled by the State while placing restraints on the right to privacy to protect legitimate State interests. (i.e. legality, proportionality & need) While the judgment is in context of the right to privacy, the analysis with respect to the threefold requirement for curtailment of such right is on the anvil of the protection guaranteed to fundamental freedoms under Article 21, and therefore, would also be the litmus test for invasion of an individual’s bodily autonomy under Article 21. Point 3 of the Judgments Conclusion: However, in the interest of protection of communitarian health, the Government is entitled to regulate the issues of public health concern by imposing certain limitations on individual rights, which are open to scrutiny by constitutional courts to assess whether such an invasion into an individuals right to personal autonomy meets the threefold requirement as laid down in KS Puttaswamy , i.e. (1) legality, which presupposes the existence of law, (2) need, defined in terms of a legitimate state aim; and (3) proportionality, which ensures a rational nexus between the objects and the means adopted to achieve them. False Claim Number 2 In the order, the Supreme Court has only suggested that the authorities review the orders which have mandated vaccines if they’ve not already revoked them. Suggestions are not commands, hence this order will have no force to compel private companies, schools, colleges, etc to reverse the mandates. Reason: In 1995 SCC (1) 259 M/S Spencer & Company Ltd & … vs M/S Vishwasarshan Distributors… on 6 December 1994, it is made very clear by the Supreme Court that even if their words in a judgement are in the form of an advice or suggestion and not an explicit command or direction, it is a judicial order and is considered binding and enforceable through the territory of India. Link to the said judgment can be found on this link : https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RhjS8La5m8wd1yfX_Ii9WYA6NkQfkiNI/view?usp=sharing Relevant para can be found on page 260 Point A of this link False Claim Number 3 In the Supreme Court order they have mentioned that the mandates are not proportionate only for the present time, and in the future, when govts increase testing and create more cases, authorities will be able to impose vaccine mandates again. Reason: In point v of the judgments conclusion, the Supreme Court has made it clear that only an increase in cases is not a sufficient ground for imposing restrictions on unvaccinated people, but they have stated a two fold criteria of an increase in cases AND new evidence being generated which shows that unvaccinated people spread more Sars-Cov-2 virus than the vaccinated. Hence a mere increase in cases cannot be used as the only ground to impose restrictions : v) …Till the infection rate remains low and any new development or research finding emerges which provides due justification to impose reasonable and proportionate restrictions on the rights of unvaccinated individuals, we suggest that all authorities in this country, including private organisations and educational institutions, review the relevant orders and instructions imposing restrictions on unvaccinated individuals in terms of access to public places, services and resources, if not already recalled. This false claim does not make sense even from the perspective of common sense. If the Supreme court was ok with the Govt imposing restrictions due to an increase in cases, they would’ve used the word […]
May 11, 2022

Indian Supreme Court Judgement Against Vaccine Mandates

A landmark judgement upholding our fundamental rights under article 21 and 14 and equating right to health to right to life under article 21.
May 10, 2022

Article 51A Letter for Police Intimation

Submit this document, after making relevant changes, to your local Police Station before conducting AIM Ground Level Activities.
May 8, 2022

AIM Statement – Jacob Puliyel Case Supreme Court Order

Awaken India Movement - Summary of the judgment passed by the Supreme Court in Jacob Puliyel’s Case 2022 SCC OnLine SC 533 [dated 2nd may 2022].
March 22, 2022

Final Rejoinders in Jacob Puliyel vs UoI & Ors

Series of Final Rejoinders filed in W.P. (Civil) 607 of 2021
March 19, 2022

Case Law for Refund of Mask Fines

Since the orders which were issued in pursuance of the show cause notices have been withdrawn by the State of Uttar Pradesh, there shall be a refund of recoveries which have been made in the meantime.
March 18, 2022

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta made overruled, false, misleading and incorrect submissions on vaccine policy.

Submissions made in Jacob Puliyel case in SC by UoI were misleading and incorrect.
December 23, 2021

DPT Vaccines – Know the Facts, Be Empowered DPT Vaccines - Know the Facts, Be Empowered

Read More
Chicken Pox Vaccine – Know the Facts, Be Empowered Indian Evidence Act – Nipah Virus Indian Evidence Act - Nipah Virus

Please find below letter to authorities including the District Magistrate, Chief Minister, Health Minister, and Chief Justice regarding concerns over the government's response to the NIPAH virus epidemic. Using Section 76 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 certain evidences have been demanded that support the Government's response to Nipah virus which have led to deprivation of our Fundamental Rights.





Download here.






Read More
Polio Vaccine – Know The Facts, Be Empowered Reality of Polio Vaccination Drive Reality of Polio Vaccination Drive

































Read More
MR Vaccination: Be Empowered, Know The Facts Are Indian girls Guinea pigs for HPV vaccine Research & Testing? Are Indian girls Guinea pigs for HPV vaccine Research & Testing?

















Read More
Say No to cultivating GM Mustard Say No to GM Mustard Say No to GM Mustard

















Read More
Deaths following routine childhood vaccines – Monthly Data HPV Vaccine Fliers: Be Empowered, Know The Facts HPV Vaccine Fliers: Be Empowered, Know The Facts

Fliers explaining the risks from the HPV Vaccine(English, Hindi and Tamil)














Read More
People’s Health Manifesto 2024 Letter to MoHFW – HPV Vaccine Roll Out Letter to MoHFW - HPV Vaccine Roll Out

Grievance Registration Number : DHLTH/E/2024/0004106





Shri Mansukh Mandaviya,
Union Minister,
Ministry of Health and Family Welfare,
Government of India,
Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi – 110108





Subject: Urgent Grievance Regarding HPV Vaccine Rollout in India





Respected Shri Mansukh Mandaviya,





We hope this letter finds you well. We, the undersigned medical professionals and concerned citizens, urgently bring to your attention our collective grievance regarding the ongoing HPV vaccine rollout in India.





Our primary concerns include the lack of transparency, safety and efficacy issues, ethical considerations, and financial implications associated with the current vaccination program. We request an immediate halt to the rollout, public disclosure of relevant documents, and an inclusive public debate to address these concerns.





Your prompt attention to this matter is crucial, and we trust you will prioritize the health and safety of our citizens.





Sincerely,





Indian Doctors for Truth






Read More
AIM White Paper – Polio Reaffirming School Mission : Schools ONLY for Education, Not Medical Interventions Reaffirming School Mission : Schools ONLY for Education, Not Medical Interventions

The below Google Drive Link contains letters addressed to all Indian State Boards including CBSE & ICSE Boards regarding no medical intervention in schools. Everyone should deliver it to their respective State Boards.









https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/12MEQDJk2D5aNDI7jSbU3tXK2Jt2vaS09









This letter emphasizes on the clarification on the purpose of school and medical interventions within the school premisis should not happen. Principals should be held accountable for any adverse incidents or side effects resulting from unauthorized medical interventions in schools. All the risk and responsibility will be of principal for such outcomes. This letter also states that the collection of students data should be stopped immediately and school must ensure and work solely on education and take parent's consent for data collection. We expect that appropriate action would be taken in this regard. The statewise letter can be downloaded from the above link and can be submitted to education minister of state, state boards, DDE, BDO, school boards and principals.


Read More
Letter to Schools – APAAR WHO Pandemic Treaty Ultra Vires of the Constitution – 16.12.23 WHO Pandemic Treaty Ultra Vires of the Constitution - 16.12.23

The letter addresses the plans of the World Health Organisation (WHO) through its proposed Global Pandemic Accord and IHR Amendments to be in charge of World Health and the dire implications thereof for Countries' Sovereignty. It highlights worries about the accord's potential impact on India's sovereignty and citizens' rights. The accord suggests granting the WHO unprecedented powers that could infringe upon national autonomy and individual liberties. Concerns revolve around potential coercion in medical procedures, ethical violations, and the erosion of fundamental rights. Urgent attention and scrutiny of this matter are urged to safeguard constitutional values and citizen rights.





Download here.






Read More
Clarification on the Purpose of Schools and Medical Interventions Urgent Rejection of IHR Amendments (WHA75.12) Urgent Rejection of IHR Amendments (WHA75.12)

Enclosed is an urgent plea to Shri Manuskh Mandaviya (MoHFW) and Mr. Tedros Ghebreyesus (DG, WHO) from concerned citizens and experts regarding imminent amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR) 2005, specifically WHA75.12. This letter urgently requests the Government of India to reject these amendments completely.





The proposed changes would limit India's ability to respond to future health regulation amendments. We urge swift action to ensure India's rejection reaches the WHO Director-General before the November 30, 2023 deadline.





We emphasize the need for transparent discussions in Parliament and the public domain to inform citizens about these critical amendments' implications.





[Enclosures: Merged Letter to Health Minister and Director General, WHO]






Read More
AIM White Paper – CBDC Letter: Call for transparency and inclusive processes in WHO negotiations 2023 Letter: Call for transparency and inclusive processes in WHO negotiations 2023

A Letter has been sent to the President of India and Department of Health & Family Welfare with 332 Signatures in regards to IHR, World Pandemic Treaty and HEPR (WHO) negotiations. The Letter calls for transparency and inclusive processes by Indian civil society.





WE, CITIZENS OF INDIA AND REPRESENTATIVES OF ORGANISATIONS, named below, are deeply concerned at and anguished by the lack of transparency and non-inclusive consultation processes adopted by the Union Government in the negotiations that are happening at the World Health Organisation (WHO), on International Health Regulation, Global Pandemic Treaty and global architecture for health emergency preparedness, response and resilience (HEPR). Several countries such as the United Kingdom, United States of America, Canada, Israel and the European Union and private foundations such as Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Global Vaccine Alliance, are lobbying for their respective interests. India is yet to formulate its position on these 3 instruments, or has failed communicate if this position has been formulated. There is no discussion either in national media or in other public domains. Despite its promises of greater openness and transparency, the NDA Government continues to pursue opaque and limited consultation processes that characterize several international negotiations with other countries.





Given this starkly visible imbalance in the practice of transparency and inclusive consultation processes adopted by the negotiating partners, we demand that the Government of India immediately take the following steps.





  1. Give wide publicity and provide open access to proposals submitted to the WHO by Government of India, as well as the responses to the textual proposals  tabled by the WHO which are publicly available.




  1. Widen the Indian delegation representing India at WHO to include multi-disciplinary experts and civil society representatives.




  1. Create forums and platforms for public stakeholders and experts including civil society, academia and media representatives to submit their views on ongoing negotiations at WHO on the 3 instruments under discussion.




  1. Ensure effective public participation in the negotiations by providing timely and comprehensive information on the status and details of the negotiations and holding dialogues and consultations with public stakeholders in India at each stage so that the negotiations are informed by the views and aspirations of all stakeholders.




  1. Enact a legislation that mandates affirmation of Indian Parliament to all international treaties, Conventions and agreements.




Signatories:





Dr. Jacob Puliyel, Delhi, MD, MRCP, MPhil, Paediatrician and Visiting Faculty International Institute of Health Management Research   Dr. Amitav Banerjee, Pune, MD, Formerly Epidemiologist, Indian Armed Forces  Dr. Donthi Narasimha Reddy, Hyderabad, Public Policy Expert and Campaigner  
Dr. Biswaroop Roy Chowdhury, Faridabad, Ph.D (Diabetes)Feroze Mithiborwala, Mumbai, Bharat Bachao Aandolan  Yukta Mookhey, Mumbai,  Civic Activist, Former Miss World 1999, Model & Actress  
Dr. Mira Shiva, Mumbai, Public Health Physicial  Dr. Nandita Shah, Mumbai, Homeopath, Founder – SHARAN, Recipient of Nari Shakti Puraskaar  Dr. Khadar Valli, Mysuru, PhD (IISc), Millets Expert  
Dr. N K Sharma, Delhi, ND (Doctor of Naturopathy), Founder Chairman Reiki Healing Foundation  Dr. Jacob Vadakkanchery, Malipuram, Naturopath, Chairman Janarogya Prasthanam Kerala  Ashutosh Pathak, Delhi, Senior Journalist
Jagannath Chaterjee, Bhubhaneshwar, Social Activist  Dr. Lalitkumar Anande, Mumbai, MBBS, PG Diploma in Clinical Research  Kaushalya (Kitu) Gidwani, Mumbai, Indian Actress & Model
Dr. Vijay Raghava, Bangalore, MBBS  Dr. Veena Raghava, Bangalore, MBBS, DADr. Shaji Kudiyat, Kerala, BSc., BHMS, MD (Hom)  
Dr. Madhuri Patil, Mumbai, BAMS, MD (Ayurveda Samhita & Siddhant)  Dr. Abhay Chedda, Mumbai, BHMS, CCAH, FCAH  Dr. Rashmi Menon, Mumbai, BHMS, ChT
Saraswati Kavula, Hyderabad, Documentary Filmmaker & Freelance Journalist, Awaken India Movement  Rossamma Thomas, Pala, Kottayam, Kerala, Freelance Journalist  Dr. Susan Raj, Chattisgrah, BSc Nurse, MSW(M&P), Doctorate Humanities, Behavior Specialist
Nisha Koiri, Mumbai, Naturopath, Awaken India Movement  Ambar Koiri, Mumbai, Awaken India Movement  Dr. Gayatri Panditrao, Pune, Homeopathic Physician, BHMS, PGDEMS  
Prakash Pohare, Akola, Chief Editor, Daily DeshonnatiBhaskaran Raman, Mumbai, Professor, Dept. of CSE, IIT Bombay    Darryl D'Souza, Goa, Earth Keepers Connect
Venugopalan Govindan, Coimbatore, Father of Late Karunya Venugopalan (Covid-19 Vaccine AEFI victim)  




Download Letter Here:






Read More
CBDC Fliers Open Letter – Boycott The Vaccine War Movie Open Letter - Boycott The Vaccine War Movie

Summary of Open Letter: "Boycott The Vaccine War Movie"





In an open letter dated September 25, 2023, addressed to Indian citizens, "Awaken India Movement" expresses deep concerns about the movie titled "The Vaccine War." The letter highlights the historically significant role that films have played as a medium for propaganda, shaping public opinion and influencing beliefs. The group argues that this particular film attempts to persuade the Indian public that COVID-19 vaccines were the sole solution to the pandemic and portrays dishonest scientists as heroes.





The letter raises several key issues, with an emphasis on questioning the necessity and safety of COVID-19 vaccines:





1. Questioning the Need for COVID-19 Vaccines:





  • The letter asserts that COVID-19 was not as deadly as portrayed and suggests that strict lockdowns were unwarranted, particularly for young age groups.
  • It criticizes the change in the World Health Organization's definition of a pandemic and argues that the panic surrounding COVID-19 was fueled by faulty testing methods.
  • The letter emphasizes that natural immunity is more effective than vaccine-induced immunity and was largely ignored in India's pandemic response.
  • The letter also raises the issue that while big money was spent for vaccine research, development and roll out, but no money was spent on research for therapeutics and natural, holistic treatments.




2. Questioning COVID-19 Vaccine Safety:





  • Concerns are raised about the movie's portrayal of COVID-19 vaccines as safe and effective, despite the vaccines not completing full trials.
  • The letter highlights issues with the manufacturing and safety trials of Covaxin and Covishield, two prominent COVID-19 vaccines in India.
  • It cites reports of serious side effects, including myocarditis and pericarditis, associated with COVID-19 vaccines, and refers to similar concerns raised by WHO and CDC.




3. Conflict of Interest:





  • The letter argues that authorities promoting COVID-19 vaccines had conflicts of interest, compromising the science of epidemiology.
  • It mentions that public-private partnerships involving drug companies and private foundations, such as the Gates Foundation and Wellcome Trust, have financially benefited from the pandemic response.




In conclusion, the letter urges Indian citizens to boycott the movie and sends a clear message that they will not be misled into believing that the rushed decisions related to COVID-19 vaccines were made solely for the benefit of the Indian population. It expresses concerns about the experimental nature of the vaccines, potential conflicts of interest, and the need for a more balanced perspective on the pandemic.





For the complete letter and detailed information, you can visit the Awaken India Movement website: https://awakenindiamovement.com/open-letter-boycott-the-vaccine-war-movie/





Download Here.






Read More
Say No To CBDC / E-Rupee Mailing Campaign: Unlawful and Illegal declaration of Public Holiday in the National Capital Territory of Delhi Mailing Campaign: Unlawful and Illegal declaration of Public Holiday in the National Capital Territory of Delhi




We request everyone to click on the link above, of your preferred language, to send an email to the various authorities. You may click the link above to open a draft email on the mail application of your mobile phone. Please remember to add your Name, City and Mobile Number in the Signature.





Subject: Unlawful and Illegal declaration of Public Holiday in the National Capital Territory of Delhi vide Notification No. 53/634/CN/GAD/2023/dsgad iii/1802 dated 24.08.23 signed by Pradeep Tayal, Deputy Secretary (GAD)





We are writing to you to lodge our grievance as citizens of India against arbitrary announcement of Public Holiday in the National Capital Territory in view of G-20 summit scheduled to be held there. Such a notification is violative of Article 19 and 21 of the Indian Constitution. Private Shops and Businesses will be required to close down without any compensation from the Government.





Please find below letter sent by Awaken India Movement.










Read More
Letter to AYUSH Ministry of India AIM Position Paper – Pandemic Treaty AIM Position Paper - Pandemic Treaty

WHO and its Proposed Global Pandemic Treaty





A draft of Global Pandemic Treaty is being prepared under the aegis of World Health Organisation, and was issued on 1st February, 2023. This Zero draft claims to propose mechanisms to create a global framework for the preparedness, detection, response, and recovery to future pandemics. In reality, this global framework appears to be a tool for further solidifying and consolidating WHO’s hold and power over member countries, and that amounts to a dictatorship, pushing only its chosen interventions that benefit the pharma lobby.





Awaken India Movement has written a Position Paper to clearly outline the problems with the Global Pandemic Treaty and to show how the WHO is not a Health Organisation.





Please find a Covering Letter for the Position Paper in the link below. This letter can be given to local Politicians, bureaucrats and other health authorities. Please add your name, phone number and address in the letter before giving it to concerned authorities.









Please find below AIM Position Paper on "WHO and its Proposed Global Pandemic Treaty". You can also download here.









The AIM Position Paper outlines the following:





  1. Global Pandemic Treaty
    - Purpose of the Treaty
  2. Major Concerns on WHO Draft Global Pandemic Treaty
    - Who is the WHO? Can we trust WHO?
    - Four Important Concerns Regarding the WHO Draft Pandemic Treaty
    - WHO’s handling of the Covid-19 Pandemic
    - Is WHO in the business of manufacturing Pandemics?
    - Is WHO a Health Organization in reality?
  3. History & Key Provisions of Treaty
    - History or Timeline of the Treaty Formation Process
    - Stakeholders that Build a Power Lobby for the WHO, whilst leaving out the very Public Whom WHO Claims to Protect.
    - Key Clauses in the Treaty
    - The 5 Broad Categories of the Treaty
  4. Awaken India Movement Commentary on the WHO proposed World Pandemic Treaty
    - The proposed treaty is couched in so many promises that it does not propose a meaningful, rational pandemic management method
    - Strengthening WHO Totalitarianism
    - Vaccine-centric Approach needs a review, as Vaccines have now been found out to cause over a hundred different types of injuries and even Deaths
    - Intellectual Property Rights IPR
    - Why the “One Health” Focus is a Power Grab for WHO & Pharma Lobbies
    - National Sovereignty
    - India
  5. Analysis
  6. Conclusion

Read More
Indian Bar Association’s document on WHO Crimes Letter to Dr. Rajiv Bahl, Director General of ICMR Letter to Dr. Rajiv Bahl, Director General of ICMR

This letter was emailed and hand delivered by a group of civil society members including Ambar Koiri, AIM National Steering Committee member. The following demand was made in the letter:





"A timely warning from ICMR about sudden deaths (Heart attack and Blood Clots) in all age groups due to Vaccine side effect will save lakhs of lives as Doctors will start advising Indian Citizens about the same and public in general will be aware of this fact and will start checking their d - dimer levels."





Find the letter along with Interim Application IA (St) 12276 of 2023 in the case of Smt. Kiran Yadav, Writ Petition 6151 of 2021 in Mumbai High Court below:





Download here.










Read More
Can HPV vaccine prevent Cervical Cancer?

Union Government Counter Reply Filed On November 29th, 2021

The Indian government's counter reply in Supreme Court against vaccine mandates on November 28th, 2021. The government emphasised on how the vaccine is not linked with any essential services and benefits.
Join Us